Don’t Trust the Inflation Numbers

Don’t trust the government reported price inflation numbers otherwise known as the consumer price index (CPI).  The government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics under-reports the true price increases that we all experience as we buy food, shelter, energy, healthcare, entertainment, and transportation.  I wrote about this in greater detail in August of 2010:

http://bit.ly/riggedCPI

You might be asking yourself why would the BLS change their methodology for computing the CPI?  The reason is simple.  The two largest federal welfare programs: Social Insecurity and Medicare would go broke dozen of years earlier without the rigging of the CPI.  It is in every president’s and congress’ best personal best interest to delay the day of reckoning.  Rigging the CPI helps to kick the can.

The Federal Reserve and the monetary base

There will be massive price inflation caused by all the money that the Federal Reserve has created out-of-thin-air since late 2008.  The Wall Street Journal author does not understand the mechanics of money creation.  The Federal Reserve creates the money and buys assets (usually US government debt like they are doing now with QE2).  This expands the FED’s balance sheet and adds money to the monetary base.  Prices don’t go up until the monetary base gets transformed into money that actually goes into people’s bank accounts. 

The fractional-reserve banking process in a nutshell

The banks receive the freshly printed dollars or digital dollars in their accounts for the US government debts that they sold to the Federal Reserve.  The banks can then lend almost all of the money they received from the FED – OR – they can choose to not lend it.  They have chosen to lend very little of it.  They call the money above the legal reserve requirement the  “excess reserves”.  The banks are holding over a trillion dollars as excess reserves.  When banks lend they create new money.  For example, if the legal reserve requirement was set at 10% (it is much lower than this), then Bank A that received a $1,000 deposit from a customer would be allowed to lend $900 and would have to keep $100 as reserve.  The person who received the $900 loan from Bank A would deposit $900 into his checking account at Bank B until he was ready to spend the loan money.  Bank B could loan $810 to someone else while keeping $90 (10%) as legal reserves.  This is how money is created.  A $1,000 increase in the monetary base multiplies many times through this process.  The M1 money supply increases.  Prices increase.

If the banks lent that money in a manner like they did in 2006, then prices would roughly double in a relatively short time.  Keep this in mind as you read the WSJ article below.

Economy by Brett Arends (Author Archive)

Don’t Trust the Inflation Numbers

A surprising number of people on Wall Street will tell you not to worry too much about inflation.

After all, they’ll say, just look at the numbers. The inflation picture is incredibly benign. In the past 12 months the Consumer Price Index has risen just 1.5%—a remarkably low rate. And when you strip out volatile food and energy costs, they’ll say, it’s even lower—a meager 0.8%.

It doesn’t stop there. Many economists will point out that wages are also rising by less than 2% a year. With so many people still out of work, goes the line, labor costs are going to stay low for a long time too. So what’s the worry?

Clearly, a lot of investors agree. Inflation-protected government bonds, which people would buy to protect themselves if they were worried, have fallen in price in the past couple of months. Gold, another inflation hedge, is down. Ten-year Treasury bonds yield less—3.3%—than they did when President Eisenhower left office.

It’s crazy. There is plenty to worry about. As you battle to manage your family’s finances, be aware that there are three reasons why inflation needs to be on your radar screen.

• First, the official inflation numbers should be taken with a fistful of salt.

Over the past 30 years, the federal government has made a lot of changes to the way it calculates inflation. It’s taken place under presidents of both parties. Each change in methodology has come with plausible-sounding justifications. But, as if by magic, each change has had the effect of flattering the numbers. Funny, that.

According to one rogue economist, John Williams at Shadow Government Statistics , if we still calculated inflation the way we did when Jimmy Carter was president, the official inflation figures would look about as bad as they did when … Jimmy Carter was president. According to Mr. Williams’s calculations, if we counted inflation under the old system the official rate wouldn’t be 1.5%. It would be closer to 10%.

Mr. Williams is just one voice. But it makes sense to treat the government numbers with skepticism.

Under the official calculations, if steak prices boom, the government just assumes you buy cheaper hamburger instead. Presto—no inflation!

Or consider the case of Apple ( AAPL: 344.46*, +3.06, +0.89% ) computers. We all know Macs are expensive. And we know Apple doesn’t discount. The cheapest Mac laptop today costs $999. A few years ago, it also cost $999. So the price is the same, right?

Ha. Not according Uncle Sam. Using a piece of chicanery called "hedonics," Uncle Sam calls this a price cut. His reasoning? You’re getting more for the money. Today’s $999 Mac is lighter, fancier and faster than last year’s $999 Mac. So the government calculates that the "real" price has actually fallen.

How’s that work in the real world? Try it. Go into your local Apple store and ask for 50% off thanks to hedonics. (If you do, please, please video the exchange and put in YouTube. We could all use a good laugh.)

Instead, the government is worrying about deflation, partly because of all the "cheap" MacBooks out there.

• The second reason to treat the official inflation figures with some mistrust is that they look backward. They register what just happened, not what’s about to happen next.

OK, so the prices of many things haven’t risen. Yet. But if the laws of economics mean anything, they will have to. Why? Because costs are rising.

Economists need to stop focusing just on labor costs. The world has plenty of surplus labor. But look at raw materials. Around the world prices are skyrocketing, from copper to cocoa. The United Nations Food Price Index has just hit a new record high. Oil’s back near $90 a gallon. Wheat prices have nearly doubled since last summer.

Soaring food prices helped spark the revolution in Tunisia. According to Alex Bos, commodities analyst at Macquarie Securities in London, other governments—especially in North Africa—have responded with panic buying of foodstuffs.

Algeria alone, he says, has bought about 1.5 million tons of wheat this month—maybe triple its usual amount. Saudi Arabia is rushing to build up grain supplies. Corn supplies are as tight as they were back in the inflationary 1970s.

Sooner or later this is going to show up in your supermarket, or at the mall, in higher prices.

Just ask McDonald’s ( MCD: 75.40*, -0.08, -0.10% ) . Or paints and plastics giant DuPont ( DD: 50.36*, +1.32, +2.69% ) . Or Kleenex and Huggies maker Kimberly-Clark ( KMB: 65.21*, -0.40, -0.60% ) . Or 3M ( MMM: 89.18*, +0.68, +0.76% ) . Or Coach ( COH: 54.61*, +1.52, +2.86% ) . These companies, and many others, have warned in recent days that they’re getting squeezed by rising costs. They’ll either eat the costs, which will hit the stock, or pass them on. How is this not inflation?

• The third reason to be mistrustful of the inflation picture? Simple. Economics.

We are flooding the world with extra dollars. The Fed simply invents as many as it likes. In the past couple of years, to try to keep the economy out of a tailspin, it has more than doubled the size of the so-called monetary base.

A dollar bill has no intrinsic value. Dollars are only "worth" something because you can exchange them for a haircut, or a pair of shoes, or a book from Amazon.com ( AMZN: 175.63*, -1.07, -0.60% ) . So if you drastically increase the number of dollars without a commensurate increase in the number of goods and services, each dollar must, by definition, be worth less. That’s another way of describing inflation.

So far, this inflation seems to have shown up in the unlikeliest of places. It’s like Whac-A-Mole. The price of vintage wines has skyrocketed 57% in the past year, according to the Liv-ex Fine Wine 50 Index . Real estate prices across China are in a bubble. So long as the Chinese tie themselves to the U.S. dollar, they are importing our inflation. But, once again, one wonders how this can be called benign.

Is inflation certain? I’m wary of any predictions. Casey Stengel once said, "Never make predictions, especially about the future." Mr. Stengel would have lasted three days as a Wall Street analyst. But he won five World Series in a row, and he knew a thing or two.

Maybe inflation really will stay tame. But I’m not counting on it. I’m not buying the conventional wisdom, and neither should you.

Published January 26, 2011

Read more: ROI: Don’t Trust the Inflation Numbers – SmartMoney.com http://www.smartmoney.com/investing/economy/roi-dont-trust-the-inflation-numbers-1296052731208/#ixzz1CAwwqdMx

Subscribe for free today at www.myhighdividendstocks.com/feed to discover high dividend stocks with earning power and strong balance sheets to help you overcome the crushing effects of monetary inflation.

Be seeing you!

Advertisements
Published in: on January 26, 2011 at 2:37 pm  Leave a Comment  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://myhighdividendstocks.wordpress.com/2011/01/26/dont-trust-the-inflation-numbers/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: